CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests

To: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests
From: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:49:56 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm with Ryan on this one, and I'm a mostly CW op going back more than a 
half-century now. We don't impose restrictions or recategorize ops who use 
software to SEND CW exchanges; why should using software to decode it be any 
different?

73, Rick / WW3DE

Sent from my iPad

On May 26, 2010, at 21:18, Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see no harm in allowing CWGet or similar and quite honestly I don't
> see the point of banning it other than to force people to learn to
> copy CW to take part in your contest.
> 
> And, IMO if you disallow these sorts of decoders you will discourage
> some newer ops from taking part. I don't see your average winner or
> top 10 using CWGet by itself. They will be mostly head copy.
> 
> Rather, it's some of the new guys who use CW copying software.  And
> maybe if they get hooked they will probably try to learn to copy CW
> because that is how you increase your score.
> 
> Ryan, N2RJ - a user of CWGet occasionally but I don't need it.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Tom Macon <tmacon@wi.rr.com> wrote:
>> We are having a discussion in our club regarding the use of CW decoder
>> programs in contests, especially smaller ones like state QSO parties.  I'm
>> referring to CW copying programs like CWget or DM780, not Skimmer.  I'm
>> looking for some outside input - here are some specific questions on which
>> we have differences of opinion.
>> 
>>  - Should the use of CW decoders be disallowed by sponsors, or should there
>> be a separate entry category for entrants that use them?
>> 
>>  - Can CW entries that use  a decoder be considered digital entries?
>> 
>>  - Have any contests disallowed CW decoders or put them in a separate entry
>> category?
>> 
>>  - If a contest introduced such rules, how might it affect the perception of
>> that contest in the contest community?
>> 
>> Any comments appreciated!
>>  - Tom, K9BTQ
>> WARAC
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ryan A. Jairam,
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>