Brian,
I don't want to pretend I know all the logic of RDXC sponsors. I am sure
they can answer most of your questions if you ask them directly. I think
there must be something attractive in their innovative approach because this
contest gains more and more popularity and Cyprus is pretty well situated to
win this contest from :)
73, Igor UA9CDC
___________________________________________________________
>As far as I know the above statement is not quite correct. If someone's log
>is missing the attempt is made to recreate sort of a artificial log of that
>station based on available logs. That technically mean that if that
>non-combatant worked not only one but several participants, the likelihood
>of counting his contacts for points is pretty high.
Igor.
So an artificial log can be created and those points can be allowed.
I don't feel that I am 'nit picking' if I ask how do they know that the
operator of that non combatant station copied my call or serial no
correctly?
Whether he did or not no one shall ever know.but I may get the
points.whereas when he submits a log and busts my serial no I lose the
points for sure. Personally I feel that RDXC are being too clever by half in
attempt to be innovative. If,as has been said here by some posters, that the
adjusted scores after these penalties does not alter the claimed standings
then what was the point of it all anyway?
73 Brian 5B4AIZ.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|