CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT -- interesting rig for contesting

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT -- interesting rig for contesting
From: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 16:58:26 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
And unfortunately, the main processor chip is also now unavailable,
according to Clif at Avvid.  

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve London
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 3:22 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TS-850SAT -- interesting rig for contesting



Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2010 01 Apr 20:34 -0500, k8gt@mi.rr.com wrote:
> 
>> First, the TS850 that I bought used, had a serial number in the
50,000,000
>> range and was produced near the end of the run, and had the CAR board
with
>> the new 66312 DDS chips, not the old 6631's that would fail (there are 4
of
>> them).
> 
> That must be the reason I had two fail on separate occasions, the first
about
> a month after I bought it and the second about six months later. No longer
> trusting it and thinking it to be a lemon I traded it for my FT-920 alomst
> ten years ago.  For those whp've not had the chips fail, good luck and
> continued success.  But even if the chips had not failed, once I tested
the
> receivers of the '850 and my FT-890 side by side, the '850 was on its way
out
> of the shack anyway.

The really ugly story behind the 66312 DDS chips is that they are now 
unobtainium. No longer available from Kenwood Parts. I saw a set of 4 with
an 
eBay "Buy it Now" price of $250.

73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>