CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
From: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:41:05 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
humor
Of course it is time for an evaluation of the scoring rules.  Doesn't
this happen
the week or two after most every contest?
We just HAVE to level the playing field by changing the rules.
/humor



On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:32 PM, David Kopacz
<david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with this picture?
>
> EF8M(RD3AF)       7374   131   409    48 11,888,100
> V47NT(N2NT)       7402   135   457    48 11,231,424
>
> Let's see, V47NT has more Q's more zones and significantly more
> countries, but a lower score!
>
> So basically, he out-performed EF8M in all aspects and still loses.
>
> I think it's time for an evaluation of the scoring rules.
>
> What do you think?
>
> David ~ KY1V
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
"I knew that God put me on this earth to be on the radio."    Ed Bradley

"Me too!"    K8DD
-
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>