CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Holding a QRG: ethics vs rules

To: "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Holding a QRG: ethics vs rules
From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:30:50 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
W0MU wrote:

> 2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, and
> logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments.
> 
>    1. 2.1.1.Use of spotting assistance or nets (operating arrangements
> involving other individuals, DX-alerting nets, packet, Internet,
> multi-channel decoders such as CW Skimmer, etc) is not permitted. 
> 
> Please note the part that says operating arrangements involving other
> individuals is not permitted.  Someone holding a frequency and then giving
> back is an operating arrangement.

Correct.  One operator and one operator only is permitted to contribute to the 
score of a station in the Single-Op category, analogies to parking 
notwithstanding.

Having a frequency held for you while you change bands to see what stations are 
there could not more clearly be in violation of this rule, even if you don't 
work a single other station on the other band.

> The SS rules detail an unlimited class for SO but the HF rules do not have a
> for this class.  There is a class called Single Op Assisted.

Single-Op Unlimited (or Assisted) has nothing to do with "assistance" - only 
whether or not information from the spotting network is allowed to be used.

73, Ward N0AX

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>