CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings...

To: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings...
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:31:30 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I thought it was common knowledge the slower CW stations gravitate toward 
the high end of the band... xx.050 and above.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings...


> In and among these various discussions about when to QRS...
>
> It used to be, once upon a time, the contest rules had "suggested
> frequencies" for slower speed CW. I suspect they probably evaporated along
> with the old Novice license.
>
> Is it worthwhile to try to bring back, though? If we tell people who 
> aren't
> "proficient" at CW there is a place for them to "try it out", would they
> show up, and if they did, would it be worthwhile to try to work them 
> (albeit
> at a shorter pace)?
>
> I know that it'd be worthwhile for me to work them, especially during the
> doldrums when every contact is an effort. Getting them to show up and give
> this a try, however, seems to be the trick.
>
> With malice towards none,
>
> Warren, NF1J
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>