CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back

To: "CQ-Contest@contesting. com" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings: Sending the CQer's callsign back
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:43:21 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm one of the guys who would prefer callers didn't send my callsign at 
the beginning of the exchange when I'm running.  They get the insurance 
against a busted call but I pay the premium in the form of lost time and 
potentially lost contacts.  I rarely heard unanswered callers stick 
around for more than a couple of QSOs.  Maybe they come back later ... 
maybe not.

73,
Dave   AB7E



PTA_ABD wrote:
> This wasteful practice saved me from having three busted calls ... all 
> dyslexiated by my poor typing. The other station corrected me all three 
> times. Preferable to having a TNX, QSL, NR, GM ( or combination thereof ) 
> preamble to the exchange. Also appreciated while I'm S&P.
>
> If it's that much of a time-waster ( since we get answers to every CQ we 
> make), maybe we shouldn't send the call of the station who called us either 
> :-)~
>
> Paul WB2ABD
>
>
> <When I was running on on 40 or 80 and others sent back my call, I felt it 
> was just wasting my time 
> - to quote KH6IJ: "I already know my call." In log checking, odds are if he 
> blows my call he gets the busted call penalty, not me.>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>