To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections |
From: | Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:10:34 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Might one consider the opposite possibility -- that the inspections are intended to prove that most of the winners are NOT cheating? There is a certain impression outside contesting that certain signals cannot possibly be generated by a transmitter of only 1.5kw. Those of us who've been to those stations know that it's aluminum -- not RF -- that's responsible. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections, KI9A |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections, Rex Maner |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections, KI9A |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Statio inspections, Julius Fazekas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |