----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
> It's BS. Open logs are BS.
Really? I believe open logs are one of the most welcome changes
in recent years.
> If you want to see my logs, ask...perhaps
> I'll let you.
Thanks, but we don't need to ask. When you enter CQWW your
logs are on the web for everyone to see.
> Think about it...if "THEY" weren't "THEMSELVES" participants
> in the very same contest for which "THEY" intend to enforce
> "THEIR" silly catch the cheater rules, none of this would
> matter!
Looks like paranoia to me. THEY are out to get someone :-)
> Personally, I don't think there's that much cheating going on.
Personally, I think there is that much cheating going on, and
I welcome station inspections and open logs.
> Perhaps it is more likely that there are a lot of people that
> are paranoid, delusional and can't quite figure out why they
> are getting beat, so they conclude that everyone else must be
> cheating.
Yes, that's me. Paranoid, delusional and a poor loser :-)
> As a "NON CHEATER", I do not advocate the use of home invasions
Ah - the power of paranoia, to make station inspections become
home invasions.
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|