I don't think that the ARRL can be consider at fault for 59/9 reports I
rembember using these type of reports because it was a big bother with the
paper logs to enter each RS/T individually so I would enter 59 at the top of
the column and draw a line from top to bottom. I doubt this was necessary but
that is the way I did it with the CQ 40 contacts per page or ARRL 50 per page.
This old fellow W5FG in all probability hasn't been very active in contesting
for a while.
Quack 77 and counting
--------- Forwarded Message ----------
From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
To: "'CQ Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 59(9) all the time!
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:26:08 -0600
Amazing. Intelligent ham operators repeating the mindless, useless
59/599 over and over and ...
Doug
I'll run the race and I will never be the same again.
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth E.
Harker
Sent: June 23, 2009 6:31 AM
To: CQ Contest
Subject: [CQ-Contest] 59(9) all the time!
The FCC denies W5FG's petition to sanction the ARRL for promoting
the
use of a "sham reporting system" based on "wholesale liar's exchanges"
in amateur radio contests:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1378A1.pdf
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
____________________________________________________________
Now is the perfect time to start or finish your college degree. Free info.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYRelTh8rCyfgt63w9lhoc355pUtmEHCdHb0JjXkq68Sh9x01lnJYU/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|