CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22

To: "Chris (DL8MBS)" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22
From: Gerry Hull <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:10:03 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hey Chris,

Your all hung up over receivers in other countries.   Yup, I asked
about it on the Xtreme reflector -- and you could hear a pin drop from
the responses I've received -- which kinda proved my point -- remote
receivers in other DXCC entities are not that exciting or innovative.
 Let's see what happens this year.

73, Gerry W1VE

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Chris
(DL8MBS)<prickler.schneider@t-online.de> wrote:
> Gerry Hull wrote:
>
>> I believe there are very legitimate "real-radio" reasons for remote
>> receivers
>
> Maybe you should quote a few here going beyond logging 240 Zones during CQWW
> (with your call on the Xtreme-reflector for sharing receivers in a worldwide
> community it should be possible - perhaps even with only 5 watts on both
> sides). Or is it already a "real-radio" reason to log DX-stations on 160m
> with qrp on both sides during daylight hours (possible with reasonable
> located remote receivers)?
> 73, Chris
>
> (www.dl8mbs.de)
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>