Hey Chris,
Your all hung up over receivers in other countries. Yup, I asked
about it on the Xtreme reflector -- and you could hear a pin drop from
the responses I've received -- which kinda proved my point -- remote
receivers in other DXCC entities are not that exciting or innovative.
Let's see what happens this year.
73, Gerry W1VE
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Chris
(DL8MBS)<prickler.schneider@t-online.de> wrote:
> Gerry Hull wrote:
>
>> I believe there are very legitimate "real-radio" reasons for remote
>> receivers
>
> Maybe you should quote a few here going beyond logging 240 Zones during CQWW
> (with your call on the Xtreme-reflector for sharing receivers in a worldwide
> community it should be possible - perhaps even with only 5 watts on both
> sides). Or is it already a "real-radio" reason to log DX-stations on 160m
> with qrp on both sides during daylight hours (possible with reasonable
> located remote receivers)?
> 73, Chris
>
> (www.dl8mbs.de)
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|