CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Borrowing Callsigns

To: "'Michael Keane K1MK'" <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>, "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Borrowing Callsigns
From: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:04:57 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I thought that was the case, but was misled by the use of "primary station
license grant" in Part 97. Maybe that's old wording that never got deleted. 

In any caee, the point is that you can "borrow" a callsign by allowing the
holder of the callsign to be the station licensee of your station.

73, Dick WC1M 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Keane K1MK [mailto:k1mk@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:26 AM
> To: Dick Green WC1M
> Cc: CONTEST
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Borrowing Callsigns
> 
> On 6/9/2009 5:32 PM, Dick Green WC1M wrote:
> 
> > Although there's a primary station location on each license, that's not
the
> > only station of which you can be the station licensee (as opposed to the
> > control operator.)
> 
> It's not a primary station location; it's your mailing address.
> 
> The FCC dropped station location from the license form back in 1993
> <http://p1k.arrl.org/cgi-bin/topdf.cgi?id=89905&pub=qst>
> 
> 73,
> Mike K1MK

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>