Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The damn robot won |
---|---|
From: | "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> |
Date: | Fri, 29 May 2009 04:29:40 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The way it was scored for human in-person participants this year, as it was explained to us by K0VBU, was that there was no penalty for busted calls. The log checking program was simply counting the number of correct calls. For that reason, we were told not to try to correct a "busted call," but to simply type the correct call into the call sign field. That is faster and easier than trying to correct the busted call. 73, John, K4BAI. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The damn robot won, Michael Tope |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] January 2009 NAQP SSB Preliminary Results Available, Bruce Horn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The damn robot won, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The damn robot won, Michael Tope |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |