RDStraw wrote:
>
>
>
>>I also have <1% dumped power at optimum on my 4-sqr, so it seems that it
>>
>>
>really wouldn't add much high-angle fill-in?
>
>You might be very surprised to see what 15 W (1% of 1500 W) can do into a
>good horizontal dipole. It certainly makes local stations aware that you're
>on frequency when they otherwise might not hear you well on the low-angle
>Four Square, which has a deep null in the vertical-elevation pattern
>directly overhead.
>
>73, Dean, N6BV
>
>Tor
>N4OGW/5
>
>Dean Straw, N6BV
>n6bv@arrl.net
>
>
>
Dean/Tor
I believe the hybrid would be reciprocal on receive (correct me if I am
wrong on this) in which case you could listen to the close-in stations
to get an idea of how much fill was provided by the high dipole. Also,
with a relay or two you could easily configure a switch that would
select between 4-square w/dummy load dump termination, 4-square with
high dipole dump termination, and high dipole direct. That would be neat
to play with.
BTW, I enjoyed your presentation, Dean. I always come away with good
food for thought after hearing one of your talks.
73, Mike W4EF...................
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|