CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics
From: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:02:25 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
> Newer logging programs, like N1MM, Writelog and Win-Test, log the frequency
> to the nearest KHz in the Cabrillo file, so it's certainly possible for log
> checking programs to cross-check and remove illegal QSOs from both logs if
> at least one of the two participants uses one of those loggers.


Dick, this is no solution either. Becaus what's in the log not neccessarily 
shows where you transmitted. I.e. I'm as a European am working split with the 
US 
on 40 m. Let's assume I work somebody who's calling on 7.240 MHz then this is 
what is logged in N1MM for instance, even if I transmit split below 7.200 which 
is legal overhere. Even with CAT control the TX frequeny is only shown on 
display during transmit. Now when do you usually log a contact (hitting enter 
or 
whatever)? During TX or rather during RX? ;-))

So your suggestion might work for 20 m simplex but that's only half of the 
story 
(if not less, hihi).

Vy 73, Olli - DH8BQA




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>