To: | "'Rick Dougherty NQ4I'" <nq4i@contesting.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics |
From: | "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:28:03 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Interesting. I would keep the QSO in the log and forward the email to the WPX guys. Removing it from the log mysteriously makes the contact never happen? CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin Hi All...this past weekend in WPX SSB, we worked a KB6 2x3 call sign on 15m....the qso took place on Friday evening on 15m...on Saturday I received an email stating that the KB6 station had realized that he had worked us and he was outside his general class privileges and that he was removing the contact from HIS log and suggested that WE DO THE SAME!!!! If I did not take his qso out of my log, then he would have been a NIL and I would have been penalized even more...anyone ever had this before? de Rick NQ4I _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS, Michael Coslo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics, Ed Muns |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics, Rick Dougherty NQ4I |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics, Ed Muns |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |