Just a little more on the dilemma.
I will not be using a tuner except on 80 and 160 as I use a SteppIR. Since
the SteppIR has various band segments within a band going from one end to
another should be no problem. How the HC1.5KAT would handle my 160-80
inverted vee is another question.
My Acom is working fine 100% but sometimes I just get the idea to try
something new. I was not entirely satisfied with my PW1 but it probably did
as advertised. I just don't like amps with so much protection circuitry
that you are forever doing resets. That was some of my experience with the
PW1 but not at all with the Acom. I know we are dealing with the
possibility of two different levels of output when comparing the THP and the
Acom but I can not run as much as the Acom is capable of putting out when
anyone is home in the neighborhood.
Oh yes, I DO NOT have unlimited radio means. So I am not looking just to
generate sales taxes and revenue for various entities.
Back now to reviewing constructive comments.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm admittedly not that familiar with the Tokyo products. If I were
> contemplating replacing my 2000A with the combo HL2.5FX and HC1.5KAT
> auto-tuner, my concern would be the rough frequency granularity of the
> band data connection. Perhaps the amp is broad-banded enough to
> require only a single setting for an entire band, but certainly the
> tuner would not be, particularly on the low bands, to present a 1.8:1
> SWR to the amp to prevent faulting. Or is there a way to control the
> combination with a little more frequency finesse?
>
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Tnx es 73
Dick W7ZR
www.w7zr.com
Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|