Apology? For what? Reporting what was going on with packet spots? Hardly!
So John, what would your magnanimous approach be toward resolving this
perceived issue?
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Warren" <nt5c@texas.net>
To: "Contest Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc
> David K1TTT wrote :
>
>> My way the peer feedback is direct and timely. Hopefully he learned
>> a good
>> lesson and will be back in the next contest, sans packet.
>
> Hmmmm. I think that attitude is very hard toward this young fellow
> David. I'm a serious DXer and not a contest entrant, but if you had
> highlighted me in that way, I would have told you where to stuff your
> contest, and it would be years - if ever - before I competed again.
> It would have been magnanimous (and "contest-promoting") for an
> experienced guy like you to offer an apology, or at least an
> explanation, to this young Brazilian. There's a bigger picture to
> think about.
>
> 73, John, NT5C.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|