Feel free to go to www.contesting.com That site has been around for a long
time.
Who said anything about scientific. If a poll is not conducted by paid
Harvard grads it has no value?
I am starting to think you are just a forum or reflector troll who's sole
intent is to cause discontent.
Applying the appropriate qrm filters now.
"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ron Notarius W3WN
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 4:09 PM
To: VE5ZX; 'CQ-Contest com'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM
A very non-scientific poll.
First I've heard of it... if you're going to cite this as a "fact" then it
should be... dare I say it... OPEN and more people made aware of it?
C'mon.
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of VE5ZX
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 10:32 AM
To: 'CQ-Contest com'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM
> Likewise, I continue on philosophical and political grounds to oppose
> the concept of "open logs" as is currently being debated. That
> doesn't mean I
The current survey on contesting.com suggests opposition to open logs for
any reason maybe a minority opinion.
61% favor open logs, 24% don't care and 8% are opposed.
... Sylvan
Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX
Saskatoon, SK
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|