Just to set things straight on the record, I do not believe that the
operators at 6Y1V did anything wrong or has anything to hide.
I am unclear of the real intent of the protest they are making.
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of W0MU Mike Fatchett
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:38 AM
To: 'Barry'; 'CQ-Contest@contesting. com'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Re: CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs]
Not much point in hiding the strategy if your log is not considered for the
final results.
I have had a couple of private emails with Dave on this and I am not sure
what the purpose of this protest really is. I am leaning with Doug VA5DX as
there is more to the story.
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:46 AM
To: CQ-Contest@contesting. com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Re: CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs]
I don't see the problem with open logs, unless you have something to hide,
and it isn't necessarily cheating. What you want to keep private may be
perfectly legal, such as your "secret strategy."
Regarding operating from a potential multiplier and publicly announcing
you're not going to submit your log actually enhances the ability for others
to pad their logs with a 6Y QSO.
How about this... if 6Y1V wants to put in a big contest effort, but not have
his logs made public, make a deal with the CQWW Committee to submit the log
as a check-log, with the understanding it will remain unpublished.
Barry W2UP
David Gilbert wrote:
> I don't think there's anything "wrong" with KY1V deciding not to
> submit his log ... for any reason. I do, however, think it's
> misguided and inconsistent of him to make a public spectacle of it in
> order to decry the presumption of guilt as his rationale for doing so,
> when the log checking process itself involves far more presumption of
> guilt than does making logs public.
>
> 73,
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
> Michael Coslo wrote:
>
>> Why on earth would anyone even complain about David not submitting?
>> He doesn't like one of the rules, acted completely within his rights
>> as an Amateur radio operator by operating in the contest, didn't
>> submit his log, and just mentioned it here, with his reason.
>> -73 de Mike N3LI -
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1925 - Release Date:
1/30/2009 7:37 AM
>
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|