So instead you spent more time discussing whether the guy is a real dupe or
not, and instead you could have simply logged the "dupe" QSO and moved on...
73 Rich NN3W
---- Jukka Klemola <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi> wrote:
> Ward's letter tells to log them.
>
> I do not.
> Instead I tell the other station QSO B4.
> In case of a disagreement, I agree with the station that I remove the
> 1st QSO and the QSO we will log is the one I leave in the log.
>
> My guesswork in this is if there was the first QSO and it is logged
> wrong at either end, it is based on luck who will get a penalty for it.
>
> To avoid confusion, I do not log dupes .. they are worth zero at the
> very maximum, in worse scenario they are negative for value.
>
>
> 73,
> jukka OH6LI
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|