CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now!

To: K0HB <K0HB@arrl.org>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now!
From: "Steve Lott" <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:40:32 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
is this horse Dead, yet ??????????????  !!!!!!!!!!

iow can we find something more positive now, please
or shall many of us abandon the reflector now !

steve
kg5vk


On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:59 PM, K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: "Rich K2WR" <k2wr@njdxa.org>
>
> >
> > A fine point regarding Part 97:
> > .......
> > Harmful interference, if it actually occurs, is always a violation,
> > regardless of the power ......
> >
>
> Well phrased, Rich.  Said another way, compliance with §97.307(d) does not
> give you a free pass to ignore §97.307(c).
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
http://stopsandmore.blogspot.com/
For Fellow Photographers

http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends

http://www.LottsPhoto.com
Our Studio Website
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>