CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Answering an age-old question

To: <n4zr@contesting.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Answering an age-old question
From: Denis Pochuev - K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:01:30 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This is fantastic! Now, can the skimmer network be used to calculate the 
average time it takes for a CQ-ing station to ID?
 
73, Denis - K7GK> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:26:17 -0500> To: 
CQ-contest@contesting.com> From: n4zr@contesting.com> Subject: [CQ-Contest] 
Answering an age-old question> > The most recent CQWWCW contest was the first 
in which the Reverse Beacon > Network (http://skimmer.dxwatch.com) was using 
version 1.3 of CW Skimmer, > which reports the signal-to-noise ratio of 
stations received by each > Skimmer-equipped beacon station. It dawned on us 
that this offers, for the > first time, the opportunity to answer the age-old 
question, "Whose [signal] > is bigger."> > Some examples:> > Skimmer Freq. Call 
Date/Time SNR> SV8RV-2 | 7008.1 | N3RS | 2355z 30 Nov | 4> SV8RV-2 | 7018.2 | 
KC1XX | 2352z 30 Nov | 4> SV8RV-2 | 7006.3 | W3LPL | 2348z 30 Nov | 4> 
...> or> 73, Pete N4ZR> the World Contest Station Database is back...> 
www.conteststations.com
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywhere_122008
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>