Joe,
Check out the sidebars in the 2006 CW SS web report at
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2006/ss-cw/
I believe the "Least-Worked Sections" and "Missed Sections" graphs would be of
interest.
In 2006, the top-5 least total QSO's were:
80. NT
79. Mb
78. NL
77. PR
76. Wy
However, the top-5 that caused the most people to miss a clean sweep were:
80. NT
79. NL
78. Mb
77. Ak
76. De
73,
Steve, N2IC
Joe Hetrick wrote:
> Being a newcomer (I'm one of those check-years that start with a 0
> *hehe*),
>
> I thought the data compiled by W5GN was kind of neat. I'm always on
> the lookout for stations reporting checks close (or later) than my own
> because I find it kind of interesting to know how many guys found CW
> as I did and enjoy it.
>
> I know in the SS world the NWT's are the tough ones; Does someone
> have a distribution of sections in logs?
>
> What sections are statistically rare, beside those in the frozen north?
>
> My gut tells me SD/ND?
>
> 73,
>
> Joe KC0VKN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|