CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Check Year Distribution-->Section Distribution?

To: Joe Hetrick <kc0vkn@bitjanitor.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check Year Distribution-->Section Distribution?
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:21:12 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Joe,

Check out the sidebars in the 2006 CW SS web report at 
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2006/ss-cw/

I believe the "Least-Worked Sections" and "Missed Sections" graphs would be of 
interest.

In 2006, the top-5 least total QSO's were:

80. NT
79. Mb
78. NL
77. PR
76. Wy

However, the top-5 that caused the most people to miss a clean sweep were:

80. NT
79. NL
78. Mb
77. Ak
76. De

73,
Steve, N2IC

Joe Hetrick wrote:
> Being a newcomer (I'm one of those check-years that start with a 0  
> *hehe*),
> 
> I thought the data compiled by W5GN was kind of neat.  I'm always on  
> the lookout for stations reporting checks close (or later) than my own  
> because I find it kind of interesting to know how many guys found CW  
> as I did and enjoy it.
> 
> I know in the SS world the NWT's are the tough ones;  Does someone  
> have a distribution of sections in logs?
> 
> What sections are statistically rare, beside those in the frozen north?
> 
> My gut tells me SD/ND?
> 
> 73,
> 
> Joe KC0VKN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>