CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 KILO vs. 1000

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 KILO vs. 1000
From: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:09:17 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 From the rules:
4.2. DX stations send signal report and power (number indicating 
approximate transmitter output power).

Technically, K and KW should not be good either, as it says NUMBER.  
However, I've always just entered K and have never been dinged for it. 

Why would you type 1KILO, which is more keystrokes than the actual 
number 1000?  Not much of an abbreviation, is it?

Barry W2UP


Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
> Remember, it is a computer doing the log checking.  Good chance that the
> programmer never thought of 1KILO as being one possible input.  Especially
> for a field that is supposed to contain a number...
>
> I believe that other abbreviations for killowatt (like K, KW, or 1K) may be
> allowed (they weren't bonked in my log check report), so I suspect you just
> got caught using a "non-standard" entry.
>
> Yes, it would be really great if ARRL put out some kind of statement about
> what they wanted in the power category.  Especially for all the different
> ways people say killowatt, but also for what to do with cut numbers and
> powers that are less than 1 watt.
>
> A better place to go with your question would be the ARRL Contest desk
> rather than the contest reflector (although I am sure the refelector will
> generate lots more discussion over what the definition of KILO really is!).
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dick Williams
>> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 6:25 PM
>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] 1 KILO vs. 1000
>>
>> I just looked at my Log Checking Report for his year's ARRL 
>> DX Contest, Phone.  I lost three QSO's for Incorrect Exchange 
>> Information, as shown
>> below:
>>
>>
>> *************** Incorrect Exchange Information ***************
>> 14164   PH 2008-03-01  1325 W3OA NC EA1APV 1KILO correct 1000
>> 14314   PH 2008-03-01  1611 W3OA NC 5Q1A   1KILO correct 1000
>>  3771   PH 2008-03-02  0141 W3OA NC YV5LMW 1KILO correct 1000
>>
>> I thought 1000, KW, KILO, 1KW, 1KILO were all equal in the 
>> exchange entry.  Looks like I may be wrong.
>>
>> What is the accepted practice for logging such exchanges?  Is 
>> it the same for ARRL DX and CQWW contests?
>>
>> 73 - Dick, W3OA
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1683 - Release Date: 9/21/2008 
> 10:10 AM
>
>   

-- 

Barry Kutner, W2UP             Newtown, PA   

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>