To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:12:21 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
You would think that most op's know when an realy active contester calls them, it is usually for a new mult or zone. We need a new Q signal for "Thanks-ur a new mult" :-) 73 Tom W7WHY > One that really bothers me is a NIL from an N7 I worked for a zone > mult. IMO, any W/VE that shows a pattern of not logging zero pointers > should be disqualified for unsportsmanlike conduct. > Barry W2UP > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2010] RRTC-2008 scores, Marijan Miletic |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2010] RRTC-2008 scores, Fabian Kurz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies..., Teijo Murtovaara |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] RRTC-2008, Igor Booklan SRR |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |