CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question

To: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>, "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:11:34 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think in the first exchange W7AA gets a Q.  W7BB gets a "busted call" (is
there a penalty?)

In the second exchange I think W7AA gets a dupe (no penalty) and W7BB gets
a Q.

"I think, therefor I may be wrong."

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
 ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb   


> [Original Message]
> From: Tom Osborne <w7why@verizon.net>
> To: CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Date: 7/10/2008 12:42:06 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Log question
>
> Hi All
>
> In the 'work dupes-no work dupes' communiocation, one thing I've been 
> wondering about.
>
> What happens when:
>
> 1.  W7AA calls CQ
> 2.  W7BB answers but logs call as W7AAA.
> 3.  W7AA gets credit for contact?
> 4.  W7BB gets a NIL for wrong call?
>
> Then later:
>
> 1.  W7AA calls CQ again
> 2.  W7AA goes ahead and works him again for a dupe (0 points)
> 3.  W7BB gets credit for a good call
>
> Does W7AA get credit for the first contact?
>
> Then on the next contact, W7AA doesn't get credit for contact but W7BB
does?
>
> How does this end up shaking out on the score?  Thanks and 73.  See 'ya
in 
> the IARU this weekend.
>
> Tom W7WHY
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>