To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Don't Change Anything |
From: | "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:18:24 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Joe, W4TV, wrote: >There is no basis to say that local skimmer technology is equivalent >to "involvement of another person." That's because the entire issue is being looked at through outdated prescription Rose Colored Glasses. The phrase 'involvement of another person' should really be 'involvement or ASSISTANCE of another form of intelligence, whether artificial or human'. FWIW & 73. Rick, K6VVA * The Locust _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 meters Propagation in June, David Robbins K1TTT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, Doug Renwick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Don't Change Anything, K0HB |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, Bill Tippett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |