CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A)

To: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>, "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A)
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:04:08 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
> Right now this
> is a unique opportunity for cw operators and contesters to show that new
> technology can make cw contesting interesting, even if you can't decode it
> by ear.  
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
>

David,

That is a persuasive argument for the use of Skimmer.  I find myself in
agreement with it.

But you didn't make ANY argument which persuades me that it belongs in
SOA-Classic.  If you need assistance copying Morse, what better class than
the assisted class?

73, de Hans, K0HB


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>