CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment

To: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>, "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:04:21 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
> I am puzzled by why my suggestion about leaving the categories as is and
> simply identifying everyone who used some form of Skimmer seems so
> underwhelming to folks. If someone believes that Skimmer is 'unassisted'
> then let them merely declare they used it and enter the category they feel
> is the correct one for them. 
>

>>If<< Skimmer were released for use during SS CW in Single-Op, I believe
it would win almost every Section/Division in which a credible installation
was used. (Credible=full time SDR second radio in use with a moderately
skilled operator.)  

A non-user "radioman" who wished to compete for some walnut would certainly
be somewhat "underwhelmed" about their chances of winning.

73, de Hans, K0HB


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>