> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stan Stockton [mailto:k5go@cox.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 21:18
> To: k1ttt@arrl.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SDR/Skimmer on another continent = REMOTE
> RECEIVER
>
> >Why would you want to send spots around the world >of
> >stations that are calling in someone else's pileup, >that's
> >just a dumb idea.
>
> Instead of trying to explain, I'll instead ask another dumb
> question and maybe kill 2 birds with one stone.
>
> Is there a list of approved "networks" for Assisted, M/S and
> M/M or would a telnet connection to a "network" of some sort
> in Europe with some packet input from DX Summit and a remote
> receiver with Skimmer/Code Reader be allowed under your idea
> of what the rules should be?
>
> Stan, K5GO
Sure, why would it not be allowed for any class that allows spotting
assistance? How are you going to tell which spot comes from a human and
which comes from a cw reader?
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|