CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW

To: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW
From: Tim Gardner <n9lf@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>From: John Geiger n5ten@yahoo.com

[snip]
>With the exception of maybe the California QSO party,
>there seems to be much more CW than SSB activity for
>state QSO parties.  
[snip]
>Does the extra points that CW QSOs score relative to
>SSB QSOs make everyone stick with CW?

The point differential can make a significant difference in at least some QSO 
Parties.  For the Indiana QSO Party, multipliers are awarded by mode, so it is 
critical to operate both SSB and CW to maximize points.
Perhaps the biggest reason is that generally poor propagation (low sunspots) 
has simply made it much more difficult to complete SSB QSOs.  This has 
certainly been observed in the INQP for at least the last two years.
Another factor is that many (most?) QSO parties have a shorter duration than 
most other contests.  That makes it difficult or impossible to take full 
advantage of the normal daily changes in propagation.
Tim - N9LF
(blatant disclaimer: INQP is this Saturday, May 3, Noon-midnight EDT)


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>