| To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Assisted vs Unassisted | 
| From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> | 
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:36:20 -0700 | 
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
| That brings up an interesting point. Supposed I take an hour break and let Skimmer run. Then when I come back, the bandmap is loaded, just like if I was sitting at my rig copying stations during my time off. 73 Tom W7WHY > As an aside, I find it ironic that some of the most vocal opponents of > remotely controlled stations (where a real-time operator must still be > directly involved) seem to think Skimmer (which keeps doing it's job > even when you aren't) is merely a proficiency improvement. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, sawyered | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Scott Robbins | 
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - Assisted vs Unassisted, David Gilbert | 
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] NS LAdder V This Thursday,, Bill Haddon - n6zfo | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |