To: | "CQ contest list" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted |
From: | "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net> |
Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:18:15 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Only if ARRL wants to exclude Skimmer from it's contests. Who's to say the rules aren't intentionally vague - mabye to encourage innovation? 73 de Al, KE1FO On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mts.net> wrote: > I would suggest the ARRL CAC has some work to do, as it could be argued > that > the rules of ARRL contests do not restrict Skimmer use. > 73, kelly > ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup, Alfred Frugoli |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted, Alfred Frugoli |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted, Aldewey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |