CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple Locations, Remote or otherwise

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple Locations, Remote or otherwise
From: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:34:45 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K8MR, who, I believe, invented the Single Op Multi-Station mode, wrote:

"I operate with different calls (the host's call) from each station. All  the 
radios are unique to each station, keeping in line with the one call per 
transmitter rule. I enter separate logs for each station."

<snip>

"I find it somewhat perplexing that more people have not taken up this approach 
to SS, as it is one heck of a lot of fun."

1.  Didn't NCCC cleverly exploit this feature of the SS rules?  The have lots 
of guys switching stations during SS, building up a big club score.  In fact, I 
think some competing clubs have started work on similar plans.  (There are 
reasonable arguments for and against changing the rules to disallow the 
practise.  I'm not advocating for either position.)

2.  "Fun" ... that's my main criterion for contesting.  (Secondary criterion is 
developing operator and technical skills, the societal justification for 
allowing ham radio to use chunks of the RF spectrum.)  I'm sure many other op's 
would find SOMS more fun than single-station, but some of us would not.  And 
some people find fun just in competing, any competition.  So, following The 
Baskin-Robbins principle, chose what you like, and enjoy!

73, Art K3KU
Tune for maximum fun

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>