> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Jimk8mr@aol.com
> Sent: March 17, 2008 22:22
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com; kenharker@kenharker.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/17/2008 5:33:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight
> Time, kenharker@kenharker.com writes:
>
> The potential of using multiple remote locations is a valid
> concern and one that contest sponsors need to make sure is
> prohibited and communicated to the contest community through
> rules clarifications, changes, or FAQs.
>
> =============================
>
> What is the problem with using multiple remote locations?
> Why is this any different from what I do in CW SS, operating
> from several different physical stations during the course
> of the contest?
>
> So long as there is no attempt to selectively work or not
> work any other particular station - the "captive rover" issue
> of the VHF world - who cares?
>
> It would be a real hoot to work 24 hours from CT3 and then
> connect up for the next 24 from 9M6. Bring it on!
>
>
> 73 - Jim K8MR
Do you operate the same call from multiple stations during a contest or do
you use varying callsigns at these different locations?
73 -- Paul VO1HE
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|