To: | "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <w4tv@subich.com>, <KI9A@aol.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs |
From: | "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net> |
Date: | Sat, 1 Mar 2008 23:31:11 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
That's exactly why all of my eQSL cards explicitly state "not valid for any award." It takes a little common sense rather that trying to "get away with something" like CQ is doing. Not sure I get this comment: Just what, exactly, is CQ trying to "get away with"? CQ does not answer to the ARRL. And I can think of no law or regulation, that CQ is obliged to obey, forbidding the publication of logs. 73, Kelly Ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Ron Notarius W3WN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, KI9A |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs, Sandy Taylor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |