CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests?

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests?
From: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:31:40 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
EI5DI said:
> It is broke!  It has been broken for over 20 years - since
> computer logging became the norm.
>
> CT, the first major contest logger, had no provision for
> logging RST Sent as anything other than 59(9).  Since then,
> the mindless exchange of 59(9) has become redundant.
>

Paul,

599, or more accurately 5NN has been the default signal report for at
least the 35 years that I have been contesting / DXing and probably goes
back even longer than that.

I think it might be more accurate to say that CT followed the de facto
standard of logging 599 as the sent RST instead of causing it.

73,

Bob W5OV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>