Ahhhh.. but sir... at this point... It strikes me that the pretty much this
entire discussion is outside
the scope of pure ethical technicalities. That is evidenced by either listening
to about any contest...
or reading a bit.. before mashing the delete key...as I am tending to do... a
lot. --... ...--Dale - WC7S in Wy> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:16:11 -0800> From:
n5ten@yahoo.com> To: phriendly1@yahoo.com; k5zd@charter.net; Tom@k5rc.cc;
kh6nd@hawaii.rr.com> CC: cq-contest@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest]
Open Letter to CAC> > > --- Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com> wrote:> > >
Or even 5nn ATT, the lack of reasonable periodic ID> > is> > one of the most
frustrating things. > > But don't the general rules for all contests cover>
this? It states:> > 3.2.All callsigns and exchange information must be> sent,
received, acknowledged and logged correctly by> each station for a complete
QSO. > > Technically both stations must send both callsigns for> each QSO.> >
73s John AA5JG> > > >
____________________________________________________________________________________>
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>
_______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list>
CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star
power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|