CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 62, Issue 41

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 62, Issue 41
From: Eric Rosenberg W3DQ <w3dq@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:57:45 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I can't speak to this specific incident, but this is *very* common for 
those of us considered by some to be 'rare' mults.

Eric W3DQ
Washington, DC

> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:40:45 -0500
> From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Busted packet spots
> To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <6.2.0.14.2.20080218173739.03e5d0d0@mail.comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 1349 on Sunday, I was mis-spotted in Europe as N4ZL, with "WV" in the 
> comments.  In the next 11 minutes, 7 of the 13 people who called me were 
> dupes.  It occurs to me that looking for similar clusters of dupes around 
> packet busts would be one way to spot undisclosed use of packet spots.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>   
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 62, Issue 41, Eric Rosenberg W3DQ <=