This sort of thing cannot be put on the backs of contest sponsors. They are
unsung heroes as is and don't need any more grief. How could they possibly
monitor everyone for such infraction? It's not practical. Those who engage
in poor operating practices wind up with lower scores just naturally.
What IS practical is for YOU to take matters into your own hands and keep
asking AGN? as often as it takes. If you get no joy, don't log the Q.
Enough of that by enough people will get the message across quickly and
effectively.
BTW, cut numbers have been around in the commercial and ham worlds for
decades. This is nothing new. However, I believe recent extensions such as
AK go beyond my acceptable bounds. The problem is that everyone has their
own bounds. I don't mind 5NN.
Just for fun, I'm logging all exchanges exactly as sent .. including the one
guy sending AK. We'll see if any dings result. I doubt it.
73, Al AD6E
SOC #351 AGN? it works!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Cc: <nccc@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 22:31
Subject: Re: [NCCC] [CQ-Contest] DUMB CUT NUMBER
> Steve, K0XP, wrote:
>
>
>
> >It's up to the RECEIVER to interpret what's sent as a power level.
>
>
>
> NO, NO, NO. The responsibility for ALL communication FIRST resides with
the
> Sender - in any venue (ham radio or not). This is why software manuals
and
> alleged 'Help' files have been notoriously dysfunctional - it all FIRST
> begins with the Sender. We have too many selfish senders who aren't
> considering the consequences of their misguided thinking upon MULTIPLE
> recipients. Period.
>
>
>
> >It's up to the transmitter to send his power level in a format that can
be
> easily and quickly interpreted and logged so he doesn't have to repeat it.
> All the rules say is send your power level: they do not >stipulate whether
> you must spell it out in Farsi, English, nor even whether you must send
> numbers or can send cut numbers: just the power level.
>
>
>
> NO, NO, NO. It is FIRST the responsibility of the Contest Sponsors to
stop
> the madness and cast some things in stone. Sorry, but receiving a power
> level of AK or some other off-the-wall crap is not my responsibility to
stop
> everything and try to interpret a misguided Sender's personal creativity.
> Contest Sponsors need to CLEARLY state WITHIN THE RULES what cut numbers
are
> permitted for power level substitution purposes if anything other than
> traditional full numbers. Better yet, BAN the cut numbers of simplify
the
> exchange to a single "dit" (that would give everyone more time for many
more
> QSOs).
>
>
>
> The Contest Sponsors can solve this problem if they don't piddle around
like
> with other issues they have historically either remained silent or
continued
> to sit on the fence about. Period.
>
>
>
> This is also the most LOGICAL solution.
>
>
>
> 73.
>
>
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|