...
>SO1R the Lazy Man's Method
>
>A recent email call SO1R the lazy mans way of
>contesting. Although I appreciate the
>conviction of such a statement, I started thinking about the comment.
I >find that SO1R is not the lazy mans way of
>contesting by any means. In fact it may
>be even harder than that of SO2R even if the SO2R has to juggle right
brain >and left brain.
>
>An SO1R operator has to have all the abilities of an SO2R
>operator but has to think differently because the SO1R operator has to
make
>some crucial decisions to compete.
>
>For instance.
>What it the best band to start
>How long do I stay on the band
>How to a balance rate versus multipliers
....
>Yes, I am looking at SO2R, not because I am torqued about the unfair
>disadvantage (I am not griping at all), but I am rather interested if I
>could run two radios at the same time. I want to challenge myself...an
>SO1R op. But, I am hardly a lazy SO1R op either.
>
>Lee - K0WA
Lee is clearly thinking how to utilise the station and himself as an
operator to the fullest extent in a balanced way to reach the maximum
score.
With one not-automated radio it really is more difficult to fully use
the operator's capabilities to make QSOs if the comparison is an
automated two radio system.
Epilogue:
I heard about it,
I did not understand it,
I read about it,
I wondered it,
I saw it,
I wanted it,
I made infra for it,
I did it
and I liked it.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|