To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 58 |
From: | Dave Lawley <g4buo@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:36:26 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> If I can recall, it said that spotted stations had somewhere around 20-30% > advantage over non spotted ones.. > > Felipe > NP4Z It's going to be very difficult to penalise stations based on the 'helpful' cheerleading of others. The only sensible conclusion is to close down the packet network during contests. We keep being told that packet spotting was set up by contesters, so why can't contesters close it down? Certainly gets my vote. Seasons greetings to all Dave G4BUO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting?, Georgek5kg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting?, Jimk8mr |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting?, Dave |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CTY-1711 Contest Country Files - 24 December 2007, Jim Reisert AD1C |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |