CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,

To: Denis K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>, <n2ic@arrl.net>,cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,
From: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:56:06 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> A related question is what is considered sufficient for completing the 
QSO, especially on CW?
> For example (say in CQWW CW):
>  
> XX1XX: CQ TEST XX1XX XX1XX
> K7GK:   K7GK
> XX1XX: K7GK 5NN 14
> K7GK:   R 5NN 3
> XX1XX: <see below>
>  
> case 1:
> XX1XX: TU XX1XX
> case 2:
> XX1XX: TEST XX1XX
> case 3:
> XX1XX: EE XX1XX
> case 4:
> XX1XX: EE

In this case, to me, at least, it's pretty clear: I don't send my callsign (a 
de 
facto QRZ?) until I am as sure as I am going to be that I copied it correctly 
and am ready for another call. Otherwise, I'm sure to lose your fill in the 
din of a pileup. (Some lids call anyway, but they're few enough that I can 
still hear you.) If I don't have you, I'm going to send AGN? or CK? or NR? 
but NOT my callsign until I'm done the Q and ready to move on.

So I'd take hearing his callsign as a clear sign that he's got you and he's 
ready to move on.

73, kelly
ve4xt

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,, ve4xt <=