ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:57:37 -0500, Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
wrote:
>I unsubscribed for a while last year, while people were arguing about
>what defines assisted/unassisted, and CKs. I came back about a year
>later and people are arguing about what defines assisted/unassisted
>and CK's.
>
> You have to admit, we are wonderfully consistent, no?
>
> - 73 de Mike N3LI -
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
The underlying problem, as I see it, is that the ARRL has not
clarified the rule. Until they do, this will go on and on.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|