CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting networks: DX or Contest?

To: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>,Untitled <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting networks: DX or Contest?
From: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:48:33 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Better yet how about educating them on the merits of filtering?

The ideal cluster IMHO is to have as much data as possible and then filter
it for what I want.

There are a number of programs that allow this.

Mike W0MU
CC Cluster w0mu.net


On 11/6/07 9:58 AM, "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> I thought I'd break off this thread into something more specific.
> 
> When there is a big domestic contest (apologies to our friends outside CQ
> Zones
> 3-5), invariably there will be complainers on packet, "why all the USA spots
> from USA stations" yada yada yada.  Here's an example from last weekend (call
> withheld):
> 
>   04 Nov NOCALL-@ (2237Z) : why fill up cluster with USA stns ?
> 
> How does one educate the users of what can now referred to as the DX Cluster,
> that said cluster had its roots in contesting (ask AK1A and K1EA), and that
> these spots constitute "fair use"?
> 
> 73 - Jim AD1C
> 
> 
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C/Ø, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>