CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assistance & Entry Status

To: "Hank Greeb" <n8xx@arrl.org>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assistance & Entry Status
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:36:50 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
> I could go on and on.  But, my question is "why do we disallow some 
> forms of technological advances in contesting, but allow many, many, 
> many others?"  Or, do we equate the help from a "person" to the help one 
> gets from a stupid computer interfaced to the internet?
>

Hank,

I think (dangerous at my age) that the "assisted" category is for single
operator stations which obtain operating "intelligence" (callsigns, QRG's,
etc.) >>from the efforts of other operators<<.  That "intelligence" might
come from a spotting net, a cluster, <alt-f8>, or other means where
>>another operator<< contributes information to your real-time operation.

It has nothing to do with the technology which delivers the assistance. 
That information might come to you by an internet connection, packet
cluster, a carrier pigeon, or on a diskette labeled "master.dta" which you
picked up at a club meeting.

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
 ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb   


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>