Thanks, Dave - I didn't recall that discussion, but then I don't remember a
lot of things these days, hi. And my apologies to Ward - I thought that
"Wade" looked funny when I wrote it - more brain fade, I guess.
73, Pete N4ZR
At 10:37 PM 10/9/2007, Dave Hachadorian wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
>To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 6:51 PM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [TowerTalk] Skyhawk, KT36XA,
>opinions requested
>
>
> >I respect K6LL a lot, but when he says Steve and Wade
> >"apparently" had a
> > misconfigured antenna, I wonder how he arrived at that
> > conclusion. Both
> > Wade and Steve are honorable people, and if this
> > information is correct I
> > would have expected them long since to have acknowledged
> > it and told people
> > not to rely on their KT-34XA review.
>
>The 1999 Dayton Convention, where the test results were
>first presented, was a long time ago. I don't have copies of
>the emails exchanged between Ward and myself, but I think he
>and I pretty much agreed that their sample of the XA was
>defective. Consider my Towertalk posting in June of 1999. It
>did not draw any flak from Ward or Steve at the time. If
>they have any contrary opinions, maybe they will speak up
>now.
>
>http://lists.contesting.com/_towertalk/1999-06/msg00214.html
>
>Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
>Yuma, AZ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|