On Aug 10 21:24, "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net> wrote:
>
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] LOTW & Forums vs. "reflectors"
>
> You are welcome to start your own forum. I am sure the owners of this
> reflector will even let you promote it here - once or twice.
>
> I find the archives of this reflector and others, located at
> www.contesting.com, to provide everything I need. Use Google if you need
> better search tools.
>
> Cq-contest is the "water cooler" of choice for kibitzing about contesting.
> That's why it is "better".
I wouldn't dream of reinventing the wheel, for I've seen quite a lot of people
start ham-radio-related forums sites only to flop due to lack of interest.
Since CQ-Contest is where the community resides, it would be folly to generate
another discussion medium duplicating the effort.
CQ-Contest is precisely what you way it is, and I signed on for that reason. I
was merely adding my tuppence and opinions, such as they are. I'm learning by
reading what is written here by you and other long-time veterans of radiosport,
and I appreciate every scrap of knowledge!
Cheers,
Bob NQ3X
--
No cute furry animals were harmed in preparing and sending this email.
Countless electrons, however, were terribly inconvenienced.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|