At 10:10 PM 6/18/2007 +0000, steve.root@culligan4water.com wrote:
>The economic argument is probably the most valid, but as a contester/DXer
>I still feel somewhat slighted.
I've always felt VERY slighted; and it's always been the main reason why
I've not renewed my QST subscription from time to time (no chastisements
required that I'm not really "buying" a subscription to QST but instead,
paying for ARRL membership for which QST happens to be a "fringe benefit",
eh ;o\ ;o\ ;o\ )
Steve, K0XP
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|